<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash&#8217;s Weaknesses: Then and Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/</link>
	<description>Adventures in web and graphic design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:40:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sandrar</title>
		<link>http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-109075</link>
		<dc:creator>sandrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/#comment-109075</guid>
		<description>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post... nice! I love your blog.  :) Cheers! Sandra. R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post&#8230; nice! I love your blog.  <img src='http://f6design.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cheers! Sandra. R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/#comment-915</guid>
		<description>@Eddie: The Flash vs HTML debate is something I struggle with a lot. I worked for a number of years as a fulltime Flash designer/developer, and have a great love of Flash. But in the current climate Flash is clearly unfashionable, and I find it difficult to identify the real-world benefits of 100% Flash websites. I think it&#039;s telling that of the sites I visit on a regular basis (and there are many), not one of them is a Flash site, and I&#039;m a Flash developer!  As you suggest, many sites I build today are HTML with a sprinkling of Flash, which gives the best of both worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eddie: The Flash vs HTML debate is something I struggle with a lot. I worked for a number of years as a fulltime Flash designer/developer, and have a great love of Flash. But in the current climate Flash is clearly unfashionable, and I find it difficult to identify the real-world benefits of 100% Flash websites. I think it&#8217;s telling that of the sites I visit on a regular basis (and there are many), not one of them is a Flash site, and I&#8217;m a Flash developer!  As you suggest, many sites I build today are HTML with a sprinkling of Flash, which gives the best of both worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Truman</title>
		<link>http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Truman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 06:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Ah, how this post took me back to a very specific moment in time when Macromedia (as it then was) and a fairly large contingent of web design people were convinced all web sites would be 100% Flash based in the very near future.
The web was descending into overly designed, bloated and unindexable madness.
Then CSS happened and we were saved  !
I&#039;ve never seen it written as such but the cast iron law of web design from that near miss with madness has to be;
Only ever use Flash as but one small component of a web page... if you really have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, how this post took me back to a very specific moment in time when Macromedia (as it then was) and a fairly large contingent of web design people were convinced all web sites would be 100% Flash based in the very near future.<br />
The web was descending into overly designed, bloated and unindexable madness.<br />
Then CSS happened and we were saved  !<br />
I&#8217;ve never seen it written as such but the cast iron law of web design from that near miss with madness has to be;<br />
Only ever use Flash as but one small component of a web page&#8230; if you really have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/#comment-775</guid>
		<description>@Aaron: Good point, I should have mentioned the existence of the Flash Search Engine SDK.

In my experience searches within Flash files are possible, but won&#039;t show up in a typical google search. If you add filetype:swf to your search term, then you will get just Flash results, but of course you would need to know that the content you are looking for is contained in a Flash movie.

I think Google also has problems indexing content pulled dynamically into a Flash movie, such as from a database or XML file.

I imagine there might also be issues with spidering Flash movies that are embedded using javascript, which of course has been a necessity ever since the Eolas patent challenge was upheld.

So although the SDK is definitely a step in the right direction, I would evaluate it&#039;s real world impact as virtually nil, sadly.

On the other hand, embedding html content inside of noscript tags, or sniffing search engines and presenting them with different content definitely works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aaron: Good point, I should have mentioned the existence of the Flash Search Engine SDK.</p>
<p>In my experience searches within Flash files are possible, but won&#8217;t show up in a typical google search. If you add filetype:swf to your search term, then you will get just Flash results, but of course you would need to know that the content you are looking for is contained in a Flash movie.</p>
<p>I think Google also has problems indexing content pulled dynamically into a Flash movie, such as from a database or XML file.</p>
<p>I imagine there might also be issues with spidering Flash movies that are embedded using javascript, which of course has been a necessity ever since the Eolas patent challenge was upheld.</p>
<p>So although the SDK is definitely a step in the right direction, I would evaluate it&#8217;s real world impact as virtually nil, sadly.</p>
<p>On the other hand, embedding html content inside of noscript tags, or sniffing search engines and presenting them with different content definitely works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Bassett</title>
		<link>http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/comment-page-1/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Bassett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://f6design.com/journal/2007/02/10/flashs-weaknesses-then-and-now/#comment-770</guid>
		<description>Good article but I have to disagree with your point on Search Engine Issues. Some search engines (google, perhaps others) can index text within a swf.

There is an interview on search engine workshops which covers most of the details about it. 
 - http://www.searchengineworkshops.com/articles/flash.html

I know its not perfect but at least it is a step in the right direction :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article but I have to disagree with your point on Search Engine Issues. Some search engines (google, perhaps others) can index text within a swf.</p>
<p>There is an interview on search engine workshops which covers most of the details about it.<br />
 &#8211; <a href="http://www.searchengineworkshops.com/articles/flash.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchengineworkshops.com/articles/flash.html</a></p>
<p>I know its not perfect but at least it is a step in the right direction <img src='http://f6design.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
